Does a strategic plan replace a LRIP?

No. Long-range interpretive planning and strategic planning are very different. The purpose each serves and the outcomes from each process are very different. And, when done properly, having both types of plans will help you more effectively manage and lead your program. If you haven’t done strategic planning with us before (even if you have done strategic planning), we strongly encourage you to watch this free, 15-minute lesson. It will add a lot of clarity about when to use different types of planning (and help you know what’s best for you now!).

 

Do you offer “strategic interpretive planning”?

Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as “strategic interpretive planning.” There’s interpretive planning (which is operational), and there’s strategic planning. You need both.

 

We specialize in strategic planning, including strategic planning for interpretive programs. We do not offer (classic) interpretive planning. We are really careful with our language because it’s easy to have different (and incorrect) expectations, especially for folks who are very familiar with interpretive planning and haven’t had the opportunity to do much strategic planning yet. To help explain, we need to share a bit about how we think of (and teach) strategic and interpretive planning. 

 

The purpose of strategic planning is to help the team get clear about the change that’s needed and create a plan to make that change happen. Whether or not you are an interpretive program, this high-level purpose is always the same. Some examples of the needed change addressed with a strategic plan are things like:

How might we…

  • Reinvent our program to meet today’s demands and needs
  • Reset our program to account for shifts in capacity and workload
  • Increase visitor satisfaction and positive feedback
  • Diversify audiences and/or visitors
  • Diversify the workforce and develop pathways to employment
  • Interpret and promote global issues, such as sustainability and climate change 
  • Begin reparations and highlight Indigenous stories

 

Strategic plans can be thought of as a “map” to get you from the starting point through the change you want to create. They are typically short, 5-10 pages long, and are temporary plans, completing in 3-5 years.

 

Interpretive plans are a form of operational plans. All operational plan’s purpose is to guide ongoing operations. This is (or should be) the case for interpretive plans. Examples of the foundations defined by interpretive plans that guide ongoing operations are things like:

What are our expectations, requirements, or standards for:

  • Site purpose and significance/values
  • Interpretive themes (and related goals; for example, “we want people to learn X or understand Y”)
  • Management expectations/requirements
  • Visitor experience and profiles
  • Personal and non-personal services
  • Collection and archive SOPs
  • Research parameters and needs
  • Structure and staffing requirements
  • Outreach and civic engagement/community engagement requirements

 

Operational plans/interpretive plans can be thought of as “instruction manuals.” They are typically long, 50-150 pages, and semi-permanent plans that last indefinitely and are only updated as changes are required. 

 

BOTH types of plans are needed, serve different but important roles, and should work together for the most effective management of the sites.

 

This is all to demonstrate that we teach that strategic planning and interpretive planning are different and briefly explains why, in our teaching and consulting, there is no such thing as “strategic interpretive plans.” 

  1. There are strategic plans.
  2. There are interpretive plans.


You should use strategy, strategic thinking, and strategic acumen to create BOTH types of plans. But that’s not what makes a strategic plan strategic. They are distinct based on the planning purpose and the resulting length and permanency of the plan.

Curious about training options? See below.

We offer live cohort, self-paced, and private training options.

Common Question

How is the cohort focus for interpretive programs different from the others? 

That’s where the planning adaptations come in. We teach how to adapt the strategic planning processes to account for the unique needs of interpretive programs. Here are some examples:

  • You don’t have customers; you have visitors and stakeholders. How you assess visitors’ experiences and needs will be different from how a for-profit organization does so for customers. Companies rarely need to engage stakeholders, but interpreters almost always do, so we teach them how.
  • Interpretive programs have different and sometimes mixed funding or financial resource structures. It could be fees, grants, agency-funded, or a mix. In a strategic planning process, financial resources are always part of the conversations and decision-making and have to be incorporated.
  • Interpretive programs are often accountable to or working in collaboration with other people or teams. For example, the interpretive program is often one part of a bigger organization that also might have natural resource programs and facilities management teams that they have to collaborate with to run their program – how do those demands influence the process and the resulting decisions in strategic planning? How will you nest your program’s strategic plan within a bigger organization plan or other management plans? 

Need a private training?

We offer private training options for teams and complex planning scenarios.